What is Assassination?

흥신소 Assassination is the murder of a person who has political power. It can be done for any reason: to seize power, start a revolution, hurt a cause, revenge, or just for the heck of it.

흥신소

The essential point is that the victim must die. Simple poisoning or falling into a river usually suffices, but they are dangerous and unreliable.

Weapons

Assassination may be carried out with a wide variety of weapons, including bludgeons, knives and firearms. Guns are perhaps the most common means of assassination, especially since the advent of modern handguns. Famous guns include the Carcano rifle used to kill John F. Kennedy, the pocket Derringer used to kill Abraham Lincoln, and the FN Model 1910 semiautomatic pistol that killed Gavrilo Princip in World War I.

A variety of other, less-famous firearms have been employed in assassinations. For example, the KGB designed a “lipstick pistol,” or cosh, for use by female agents (and male agents operating as homosexuals). This was essentially a 4.5-mm single-shot pistol encased in rubber and disguised with a lipstick tube. It fired when the user twisted the knurled ring a quarter-turn.

There are many other, even more crude weapons that can be fashioned into assassination instruments. For instance, the CIA used a small club-like instrument known as a cosh to stun its victims in close combat. A cosh is more difficult to wield than a weapon that can fire bullets, but it is still capable of causing fatal injury if wielded with sufficient force.

Whatever weapon is used for assassination, one thing is vitally important: Death must be absolutely certain흥신소 . This is an essential point that is often overlooked. Clandestine assassins may be so focused on completing their mission that they forget to consider whether the victim will really die.

Accidents

The assassination of political leaders is prone to accidents. A stray bullet can cause a fatal wound, or the assassin may miss entirely. In assassination attempts that involve explosive charges or poison gas, the charge can fail to detonate at all, or it may kill someone else instead of its intended target. Even well-planned attacks are not foolproof. In the case of the assassination of President Kennedy, a second assassin may have fired a shot that missed his intended target and killed a bystander instead. This possibility was only uncovered through the revelation of redacted FBI documents as the result of a FOIA request by news network Al Jazeera.

Assassination is most likely to be successful when it serves narrowly defined purposes (retaliation, discipline, or elimination of rivals) and when the assassin has organizational support. It is most effective in periods of conflict and when it targets a leader who is a symbol of the prevailing power structure. In democratic societies, assassination tends to undermine political institutions, promote opportunism and autocracy, and reduce the capacity for adapting to environmental or internal changes.

The recent assassination attempt on Congressman Zeldin and the murder of Reverend Clementa Pinckney highlight how political violence still poses a grave threat to civil society. While improved personal security is a first line of defense, deterring assassination requires serious thought. This includes identifying potential assassins, taking threats articulated on social media and elsewhere seriously, and bolstering preventive detention programs.

Detonation

The detonation of an explosive device during Assassination is the crucial event that determines success or failure. The assassin must be sure that he or she will be able to place the charge near enough to kill the subject and fire it at exactly the right moment. A large explosive will allow the assassin to accomplish this task, but it is often necessary to rely on small, easily controlled charges for safety reasons or to overcome guard barriers. It is very difficult to ensure that these devices will not be accidentally fired or that the subject will not wander into the vicinity of the charge at the moment of detonation.

Various chemical compounds can be used to assassinate a target, but these methods are usually very unreliable. A drug such as morphine or an overdose of a similar narcotic can be very effective and may not be detected, especially if the assassin is trained to act in the role of a nurse or doctor. It is also possible to assassinate a person with a sabotage bomb.

A sabotage bomb is an explosive device that has been placed in a hidden location where it will not be noticed. The device is activated by a radio receiver or some other means and causes an explosion that will destroy all buildings and other structures within several miles of the site of the detonation. The explosion generates a shock wave, and a heat wave that can reach tens of millions of degrees near the point of detonation.

Alibi

A common defense against criminal charges is an alibi. An alibi shows that the accused was somewhere else when a crime was committed. This is a powerful defense and can help get a criminal charged with murder or other crimes dismissed by the courts. However, it can be difficult to prove. It is important to hire an experienced attorney who knows how to fight for an alibi defense. The attorney can investigate whether or not an alibi is valid and ensure the accused follows any procedural requirements or deadlines for alibis in the court where the case is being heard.

Assassination is usually done for political reasons, such as seizing power, starting a revolution, drawing attention to a cause or exacting revenge. Assassinations have taken place in all parts of the world and throughout history, most often involving prominent people.

The assassin must have a strong alibi to avoid being caught. This can be achieved by providing a witness or evidence to back up the alibi. This can include video footage, GPS or phone records, photos, swipe card records and other objective evidence. These forms of evidence are generally more trusted than eyewitness testimony. However, a prosecutor can still challenge these forms of evidence by questioning the reliability of the witness or challenging the accuracy of the data presented.